President Trump takes questions from members of the press aboard Air Force One.
Samuel Corum/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Samuel Corum/Getty Images
President Trump once insisted he had “nothing to do with Project 2025,” the right-wing policy plan that became a key flashpoint during the presidential campaign.
The Democrats tried to turn the 900-page Heritage Foundation-led blueprint to remake the government into a political boogeyman, and succeeded to some degree, but it wasn’t enough to win the election.
A year later, many of the policies have been implemented, from cracking down on immigration to dismantling the Department of Education.
“A lot of the policies from Day 1 to the last day and in between that the administration has adopted are right out of Project 2025,” said Rob Bonta, the attorney general of California, who has used Project 2025 to prepare legal papers against the administration.
Concerns about the project started to bubble up over the spring of 2024, but really caught fire a few months later when actress Taraji P. Henson singled out Project 2025 while hosting the BET awards.
“Pay attention. It’s not a secret. Look it up!” she said, speaking directly into the camera during the show. “They are attacking our most vulnerable citizens. The Project 2025 plan is not a game.”
“Ridiculous”
Then-candidate Trump tried to dismiss the hysteria, calling the ideas “ridiculous” — and claiming he did not know who was behind it — even though key people involved in developing the plans served in his first administration.
And when it was clear the firestorm would not go away, Trump went on the attack against those allies who wrote the playbook.
“They’re a pain in the a**,” said Chris LaCivita, a senior adviser to the Trump campaign, who tore into the organizers of Project 2025 at an event hosted by CNN and Politico during the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee.
“Look, I think that in the perfect world, from their perspective, they would love to drive the issue set, but they don’t get to do that,” he added.
Yet days after winning, Trump tapped Russell Vought, an architect of Project 2025, to lead the Office of Management and Budget — considered the nerve center of the White House. Other contributors followed.
Trump soon unleashed a flurry of orders reshaping the government, many of which were outlined in Project 2025.
“As of today, it will henceforth be the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders, male and female,” he said during his inaugural address.
Trump ended diversity, equity and inclusion programs. He launched massive immigration enforcement and took the first steps to overhaul the federal workforce.
Bonta, the attorney general of California, said Project 2025 defined Trump’s first year back in office. The country’s 23 Democratic attorneys general studied Project 2025, consulted with each other and, he said, prepared a response for every potential action should it be taken.
“The existence of Project 2025 was the Trump administration telling us exactly what they were going to do and sending it to us in writing,” Bonta said.
Bonta has filed or joined lawsuits that have successfully blocked Trump’s policies requiring states like California to join his immigration crackdown, freeze of domestic federal funding and layoffs at agencies such as the U.S. Department of Education.
The White House dismissed concerns about Project 2025, calling them irrelevant theories from Beltway insiders.
“President Trump is implementing the agenda he campaigned on and that the American people voted for,” said Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman.
Jackson said the president focused on implementing the agenda he campaigned on — lowering gas prices, accelerating economic growth and securing the border.
Fueling controversy
Trump may have actually fueled the controversy by rejecting Project 2025 during the campaign, said Tevi Troy, a presidential historian and former White House aide to George W. Bush.
“I would say that Project 2025 was largely standard conservative fare, but with a bit more of a MAGA flavor than previously.”
Troy sees little difference between what the Heritage Foundation did with Project 2025 and what think tanks on the left and right have been doing for years compiling policy proposals for incoming presidents.
He pointed to the personnel and policy ideas of the Hoover Institution that helped shape the George W. Bush administration and the Center for American Progress’ influence on the Obama administration.
“If the Trump campaign had leaned into it and said, ‘sure, this is an agenda that has been put out as a think tank. This happens all the time. We will look at them in due time when the election is over,’ ” said Troy. “By criticizing and disavowing Project 2025, it suddenly became more radioactive.”
Trump did eventually embrace Project 2025 during the shutdown fight last fall.
He boasted of meeting with “Russ Vought, he of PROJECT 2025 Fame,” while threatening to dismantle federal agencies.
“I can’t believe the Radical Left Democrats gave me this unprecedented opportunity,” he said.
