GUATEMALA CITY — Two Mexican women were married inside the grounds of Mexico’s embassy in Guatemala on Friday, sparking anger in a nation that doesn’t recognize same-sex marriage and debate over diplomatic sovereignty.
The ceremony held in the embassy gardens was intended to celebrate Pride Month, which is celebrated every June, and the consulate said the marriage marked a step toward inclusion, respect and equality for all.
“We celebrate love without borders,” wrote the embassy in a post on the social media platform X. “This is the first civil wedding of a same-sex couple at the Embassy of Mexico in Guatemala. It’s a right granted to all individuals when both are Mexican citizens.”
Shortly after, the ceremony sparked an outcry among conservative politicians in Guatemala, a largely Catholic country and one of a handful in Latin America that still doesn’t recognize same-sex marriages. While such marriages aren’t explicitly prohibited, Guatemalan law only refers to unions between a man and a woman.
Allan Rodríguez, the head of the VAMOS party bloc and ally of former president Alejandro Giammattei, was among those to reject the wedding, writing in a statement that “although the act may be protected under external jurisdictions, it clearly contradicts Guatemala’s current legal framework.”
According to the congressman, the properties where embassies are located “are not foreign territory; they merely enjoy diplomatic privileges” and therefore are not a part of the Mexican state. He claimed considering them as such would “violate constitutional principles of sovereignty, territorial unity, and the rule of law.”
Rodríguez, a former president of Congress, is sanctioned by the United States for obstructing anti-corruption efforts and undermining democracy in Guatemala.
The office of progressive President Bernardo Arévalo said that under international law embassies like Mexico’s “have territorial immunity and operate under the jurisdiction of the state they represent.”
“In this case, it is an activity carried out by the Mexican Consulate in Guatemala and aimed at Mexican citizens. Therefore, it is exclusively the responsibility of the Government of Mexico, through its diplomatic representation, to comment or speak on the matter,” the embassy statement said.
Still, debate only continued on, with Elmer Palencia, a congressman for the VALOR party, created by the daughter of a former dictator, called the marriage, “not an act of inclusion, but a provocation.”
“Out of respect for the host country, Mexico should refrain from that narrative. Guatemalan sovereignty and social institutions deserve that respect,” he said.
Constitutional lawyer Edgar Ortíz contradicted the conservative politicians, saying the marriage doesn’t violate Guatemala’s sovereignty and complies with the Vienna Convention, which establishes that what happens on diplomatic premises “are not subject to the host state’s jurisdiction.” He noted that Guatemala’s constitution establishes that the country will govern following international principles.
“In no way are Guatemala’s laws being altered; the effects of this marriage will occur in Mexico, which does recognize same-sex marriage,” he said.
“Rather,” he added, “it is the Guatemalan lawmakers who are violating sovereignty, by interfering in Mexico’s affairs and trying to tell them what they can or cannot do. That seems far more discourteous.”
